<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conditionals in Io</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philcrissman.com/2008/05/02/conditionals-in-io/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philcrissman.com/2008/05/02/conditionals-in-io</link>
	<description>Web Development, startups, entrepreneurship, books, art, and other stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil Crissman</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2008/05/02/conditionals-in-io#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Crissman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcrissman.com/?p=1577#comment-1992</guid>
		<description>I'd have to play with it a little more. Also, as I consider my use of the word "intuitive", I suppose I'd need to expand that to "intuitive in a way that I hadn't considered previously", which could be open to the interpretation that it isn't really that intuitive after all. Or, that it's intuitive after you know how it works, which is a bit of a tautology itself.

Then again, it's always possible that I simply fell for the lure of something new and shiny... it's not as though &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt;'s never happened. ;-) 

But from a cursory look, I do like Io, it's quite interesting. What would I &lt;em&gt;use&lt;/em&gt; it for? I've no idea, at this point. But not everything needs to be completely utilitarian...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to play with it a little more. Also, as I consider my use of the word &#8220;intuitive&#8221;, I suppose I&#8217;d need to expand that to &#8220;intuitive in a way that I hadn&#8217;t considered previously&#8221;, which could be open to the interpretation that it isn&#8217;t really that intuitive after all. Or, that it&#8217;s intuitive after you know how it works, which is a bit of a tautology itself.</p>
<p>Then again, it&#8217;s always possible that I simply fell for the lure of something new and shiny&#8230; it&#8217;s not as though <em>that</em>&#8217;s never happened. ;-) </p>
<p>But from a cursory look, I do like Io, it&#8217;s quite interesting. What would I <em>use</em> it for? I&#8217;ve no idea, at this point. But not everything needs to be completely utilitarian&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrben</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2008/05/02/conditionals-in-io#comment-1982</link>
		<dc:creator>mrben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 11:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcrissman.com/?p=1577#comment-1982</guid>
		<description>Looks very much like how you do it in Excel (and other spreadsheets ;) ). Personally, I don't think it is as intuitive - I'd like to see what happens when you have to pass multiple statements to it, or nest multiple if/then/elses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks very much like how you do it in Excel (and other spreadsheets ;) ). Personally, I don&#8217;t think it is as intuitive - I&#8217;d like to see what happens when you have to pass multiple statements to it, or nest multiple if/then/elses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.387 seconds -->
