<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The EEE PC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philcrissman.com/2008/04/15/the-eee-pc/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philcrissman.com/2008/04/15/the-eee-pc</link>
	<description>Web Development, startups, entrepreneurship, books, art, and other stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Campbell</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2008/04/15/the-eee-pc#comment-1963</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcrissman.com/?p=1563#comment-1963</guid>
		<description>I bought an eeepc for my wife late last year.  She loves it, as do the kids (lots of fun, cute games).  While I was updating the default xandros install, I bricked the OS, and chose to re-install eeeXubuntu - it is awesome, highly recommended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought an eeepc for my wife late last year.  She loves it, as do the kids (lots of fun, cute games).  While I was updating the default xandros install, I bricked the OS, and chose to re-install eeeXubuntu - it is awesome, highly recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Crissman</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2008/04/15/the-eee-pc#comment-1948</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Crissman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcrissman.com/?p=1563#comment-1948</guid>
		<description>That's good to know... yes, sadly, I was looking for an actual icon, program, or option to open a terminal. But still... I think the first thing I would do is load Ubuntu (eeeUbuntu, as the case may be) on the little thing instead of its default. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s good to know&#8230; yes, sadly, I was looking for an actual icon, program, or option to open a terminal. But still&#8230; I think the first thing I would do is load Ubuntu (eeeUbuntu, as the case may be) on the little thing instead of its default. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrben</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2008/04/15/the-eee-pc#comment-1947</link>
		<dc:creator>mrben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcrissman.com/?p=1563#comment-1947</guid>
		<description>The default shortcut for launching a terminal works fine on the eeepc - I can't remember what it is at the moment, but I know it worked on an eeepc in our local Toys-R-Us. Ctrl-Alt-T maybe? 

(edit - a quick google confirms that it is Ctrl-Alt-T)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The default shortcut for launching a terminal works fine on the eeepc - I can&#8217;t remember what it is at the moment, but I know it worked on an eeepc in our local Toys-R-Us. Ctrl-Alt-T maybe? </p>
<p>(edit - a quick google confirms that it is Ctrl-Alt-T)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Crissman</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2008/04/15/the-eee-pc#comment-1946</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Crissman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcrissman.com/?p=1563#comment-1946</guid>
		<description>@mrben ahhh, Xandros. It's very customized... and it is interesting, but not usable if you actually want to have, you know... a terminal. It's possible there's a way to enable that, though I didn't see it when I looking...

@Trisha, I agree, 512 really is still enough for most tasks; if 1GB were available, though, I think I'd go for that instead.

Also, if you're considering moving to Ubuntu as a main OS, check out &lt;a href="http://linuxmint.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Linux Mint&lt;/a&gt; also. Mint basically &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; Ubuntu, made even more user friendly, and enabling quite a few handy features by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mrben ahhh, Xandros. It&#8217;s very customized&#8230; and it is interesting, but not usable if you actually want to have, you know&#8230; a terminal. It&#8217;s possible there&#8217;s a way to enable that, though I didn&#8217;t see it when I looking&#8230;</p>
<p>@Trisha, I agree, 512 really is still enough for most tasks; if 1GB were available, though, I think I&#8217;d go for that instead.</p>
<p>Also, if you&#8217;re considering moving to Ubuntu as a main OS, check out <a href="http://linuxmint.com" rel="nofollow">Linux Mint</a> also. Mint basically <em>is</em> Ubuntu, made even more user friendly, and enabling quite a few handy features by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trisha</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2008/04/15/the-eee-pc#comment-1945</link>
		<dc:creator>Trisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcrissman.com/?p=1563#comment-1945</guid>
		<description>512MB RAM isn't all that bad. I was running 512 on my -desktop- for -4- years before I bought a 1G stick - last month. And it's running Winblows (switching to Ubuntu as soon as I can get all 320G of HD uploaded...) You can tell where my priorities are.

But as I was staring at that picture trying to figure out what the heck that CD was doing on the keyboard, I had a D'OH moment and immediately grabbed two nearby CDs and overlapped them a bit. WOW - that's small!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>512MB RAM isn&#8217;t all that bad. I was running 512 on my -desktop- for -4- years before I bought a 1G stick - last month. And it&#8217;s running Winblows (switching to Ubuntu as soon as I can get all 320G of HD uploaded&#8230;) You can tell where my priorities are.</p>
<p>But as I was staring at that picture trying to figure out what the heck that CD was doing on the keyboard, I had a D&#8217;OH moment and immediately grabbed two nearby CDs and overlapped them a bit. WOW - that&#8217;s small!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrben</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2008/04/15/the-eee-pc#comment-1944</link>
		<dc:creator>mrben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcrissman.com/?p=1563#comment-1944</guid>
		<description>I suspect the poster above me ("kevin") is a spammer.....

I too would like an eeePC - there is a beefed up version due quite soon I believe. Plus, I reckon the black model looks cooler than the white ;)

Oh, and it's running on a custom build of Xandros currently, but there are alternatives out there, including eeeXubuntu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect the poster above me (&#8221;kevin&#8221;) is a spammer&#8230;..</p>
<p>I too would like an eeePC - there is a beefed up version due quite soon I believe. Plus, I reckon the black model looks cooler than the white ;)</p>
<p>Oh, and it&#8217;s running on a custom build of Xandros currently, but there are alternatives out there, including eeeXubuntu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Crissman</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2008/04/15/the-eee-pc#comment-1937</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Crissman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcrissman.com/?p=1563#comment-1937</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/asus-eee-pc/eee-pc-running-vista-make-us-go-eeek-334024.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;According to Gizmodo&lt;/a&gt;, you &lt;em&gt;could&lt;/em&gt; run Vista on it... just not very well. ;-)

But anyways... yeah. Realistically, I think it would still need to have a little more RAM for me to want one. Also, I think I'd want to use one for a couple days before deciding to own one. It's cool that it's that small, but I'm not sure how I'd really like using/typing/web surfing on a laptop that tiny. 

All the same, a very cool little machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/asus-eee-pc/eee-pc-running-vista-make-us-go-eeek-334024.php" rel="nofollow">According to Gizmodo</a>, you <em>could</em> run Vista on it&#8230; just not very well. ;-)</p>
<p>But anyways&#8230; yeah. Realistically, I think it would still need to have a little more RAM for me to want one. Also, I think I&#8217;d want to use one for a couple days before deciding to own one. It&#8217;s cool that it&#8217;s that small, but I&#8217;m not sure how I&#8217;d really like using/typing/web surfing on a laptop that tiny. </p>
<p>All the same, a very cool little machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Block</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2008/04/15/the-eee-pc#comment-1936</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcrissman.com/?p=1563#comment-1936</guid>
		<description>Hey, HL2 can run on 512MB! Look, I got the system specs for you:

Official Half-Life 2 Box minimum specs: 
Processor: 1.2 GHz Processor 
OS: Windows, 2000/XP/Me/98 
Graphic card: DirectX 7 level graphics card 
Hard Drive: 4.5 GB 
Memory: 256 MB RAM 
Other: Internet Connection, DVD-ROM Drive

Not only does your puny PC meet the requirements, it exceeds them. And hey, that DX7 level graphics card should be no problem, either.  :)

Now would Vista run on that machine? Um, no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, HL2 can run on 512MB! Look, I got the system specs for you:</p>
<p>Official Half-Life 2 Box minimum specs:<br />
Processor: 1.2 GHz Processor<br />
OS: Windows, 2000/XP/Me/98<br />
Graphic card: DirectX 7 level graphics card<br />
Hard Drive: 4.5 GB<br />
Memory: 256 MB RAM<br />
Other: Internet Connection, DVD-ROM Drive</p>
<p>Not only does your puny PC meet the requirements, it exceeds them. And hey, that DX7 level graphics card should be no problem, either.  :)</p>
<p>Now would Vista run on that machine? Um, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.471 seconds -->
