<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can We Unify Our Feed Formats?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philcrissman.com/2007/11/26/can-we-unify-our-feed-formats/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/11/26/can-we-unify-our-feed-formats</link>
	<description>Web Development, startups, entrepreneurship, books, art, and other stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil Crissman</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/11/26/can-we-unify-our-feed-formats#comment-1851</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Crissman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcrissman.com/2007/11/26/can-we-unify-our-feed-formats/#comment-1851</guid>
		<description>Good points, Garrick. That's one of the reasons I think there won't be any real push to try to unify the format of feeds; it's not hard just to support the all the current formats.

I probably just liked the &lt;em&gt;idea&lt;/em&gt; of using YAML, and let that snowball into this post. 

@mrBen... yeah, I'd agree. And for those reasons, I've no plan to attempt to create a new standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, Garrick. That&#8217;s one of the reasons I think there won&#8217;t be any real push to try to unify the format of feeds; it&#8217;s not hard just to support the all the current formats.</p>
<p>I probably just liked the <em>idea</em> of using YAML, and let that snowball into this post. </p>
<p>@mrBen&#8230; yeah, I&#8217;d agree. And for those reasons, I&#8217;ve no plan to attempt to create a new standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrick Van Buren</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/11/26/can-we-unify-our-feed-formats#comment-1850</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcrissman.com/2007/11/26/can-we-unify-our-feed-formats/#comment-1850</guid>
		<description>from my perspective as a developer, it's negligible to publish in multiple feed formats. In fact, the benefits of compatibility far outweigh the small additional dev costs.  Atom, RSS, YAML, M3U, etc, all have their strengths and weaknesses. Understanding them makes it easier to determine how and when to publish in each.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from my perspective as a developer, it&#8217;s negligible to publish in multiple feed formats. In fact, the benefits of compatibility far outweigh the small additional dev costs.  Atom, RSS, YAML, M3U, etc, all have their strengths and weaknesses. Understanding them makes it easier to determine how and when to publish in each.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrben</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/11/26/can-we-unify-our-feed-formats#comment-1847</link>
		<dc:creator>mrben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcrissman.com/2007/11/26/can-we-unify-our-feed-formats/#comment-1847</guid>
		<description>If you want to implement a new standard (and, you know, go for it) then you need to make sure that:

a) The transition is painless - you'll need plugins for all the major blog systems, and conversion routines for everyone else

b) The benefits are huge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to implement a new standard (and, you know, go for it) then you need to make sure that:</p>
<p>a) The transition is painless - you&#8217;ll need plugins for all the major blog systems, and conversion routines for everyone else</p>
<p>b) The benefits are huge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.366 seconds -->
