<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More On Ideas And Competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philcrissman.com/2007/10/30/more-on-ideas-and-competition/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/10/30/more-on-ideas-and-competition</link>
	<description>Web Development, startups, entrepreneurship, books, art, and other stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil Crissman</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/10/30/more-on-ideas-and-competition#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Crissman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcrissman.com/2007/10/30/more-on-ideas-and-competition/#comment-1752</guid>
		<description>I think you're correct about Google/MS being a different situation. It's extremely different. I guess my only point was that no one, no matter how huge, is immune to competition.

The MS/IBM deal was a combination on some prescient foresight on Microsoft's part, and a lack of the same from IBM. Alternately, it could be viewed as a really underhanded move by MS -- depends on whether or not we're talking about msdos or os/2-windows. Either way, I agree -- completely different situation.

Only common denominator; no one is immune. 

That said, IBM having changed their main focus to services and consulting really seems to be working out well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re correct about Google/MS being a different situation. It&#8217;s extremely different. I guess my only point was that no one, no matter how huge, is immune to competition.</p>
<p>The MS/IBM deal was a combination on some prescient foresight on Microsoft&#8217;s part, and a lack of the same from IBM. Alternately, it could be viewed as a really underhanded move by MS &#8212; depends on whether or not we&#8217;re talking about msdos or os/2-windows. Either way, I agree &#8212; completely different situation.</p>
<p>Only common denominator; no one is immune. </p>
<p>That said, IBM having changed their main focus to services and consulting really seems to be working out well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrben</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/10/30/more-on-ideas-and-competition#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>mrben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcrissman.com/2007/10/30/more-on-ideas-and-competition/#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>I think that the Google/MS thing is significantly different to the IBM/MS thing. Google are, so far, the best in a very competitive market, but they stay ahead by being consistently better, and by constantly innovating and expanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the Google/MS thing is significantly different to the IBM/MS thing. Google are, so far, the best in a very competitive market, but they stay ahead by being consistently better, and by constantly innovating and expanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.406 seconds -->
