<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chris Brogan: Why bother with social media?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philcrissman.com/2007/10/04/chris-brogan-why-bother-with-social-media/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/10/04/chris-brogan-why-bother-with-social-media</link>
	<description>Web Development, startups, entrepreneurship, books, art, and other stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bailey</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/10/04/chris-brogan-why-bother-with-social-media#comment-1678</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philcrissman.com/2007/10/04/chris-brogan-why-bother-with-social-media/#comment-1678</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah - thanks - that's what I decided yesterday and dropped my memberships - it seems however that other people suddenly think I'm calling the services stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah - thanks - that&#8217;s what I decided yesterday and dropped my memberships - it seems however that other people suddenly think I&#8217;m calling the services stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Crissman</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/10/04/chris-brogan-why-bother-with-social-media#comment-1677</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Crissman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philcrissman.com/2007/10/04/chris-brogan-why-bother-with-social-media/#comment-1677</guid>
		<description>Fair question: Yes, read the whole thing. It dovetailed somewhat with some comments I had been musing on earlier re: why Twitter/social networking had value.

I'm agreeing with Chris that it does have value. 

The reason I left it at that and didn't add anything was that I'd already said my bit on the subject, and mostly just wanted to link to his post, as I thought it was relevant.

Just glanced at Mobasoft (which looks sharp, btw) -- I'm not saying everyone needs to be on every networking site out there, not at all. Just that there may be value to be found in some of them. If you don't find value... don't use them! :D

Thanks for stopping by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair question: Yes, read the whole thing. It dovetailed somewhat with some comments I had been musing on earlier re: why Twitter/social networking had value.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m agreeing with Chris that it does have value. </p>
<p>The reason I left it at that and didn&#8217;t add anything was that I&#8217;d already said my bit on the subject, and mostly just wanted to link to his post, as I thought it was relevant.</p>
<p>Just glanced at Mobasoft (which looks sharp, btw) &#8212; I&#8217;m not saying everyone needs to be on every networking site out there, not at all. Just that there may be value to be found in some of them. If you don&#8217;t find value&#8230; don&#8217;t use them! :D</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bailey</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/10/04/chris-brogan-why-bother-with-social-media#comment-1676</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philcrissman.com/2007/10/04/chris-brogan-why-bother-with-social-media/#comment-1676</guid>
		<description>What does that mean? Did you read the entire blog post?

What are you agreeing with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does that mean? Did you read the entire blog post?</p>
<p>What are you agreeing with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.481 seconds -->
