<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philcrissman.com/2007/07/23/twitter/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/07/23/twitter</link>
	<description>Web Development, startups, entrepreneurship, books, art, and other stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil Crissman</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/07/23/twitter#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Crissman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philcrissman.com/2007/07/23/twitter/#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>Hi Gregg; well, I have Trompe le Monde, Doolittle, and Surfer Rosa in my iTunes. I think it was something from Doolittle on at the time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gregg; well, I have Trompe le Monde, Doolittle, and Surfer Rosa in my iTunes. I think it was something from Doolittle on at the time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/07/23/twitter#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philcrissman.com/2007/07/23/twitter/#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>What pixies were you listening to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What pixies were you listening to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Crissman</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/07/23/twitter#comment-1529</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Crissman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philcrissman.com/2007/07/23/twitter/#comment-1529</guid>
		<description>Another thought on the success of twitter, thus far. I don't think it's so much because of the value of knowing exactly what a few of your peers are doing -- I think it's the illusion of proximity that's created. 

If a group of people are hanging out in a living room, there is a sense of community even if they are not all doing the same thing; a few might be playing cards, a few might be on a console video game, someone might be reading or web-surfing. But everyone's in the same room -- you can look around and see everyone in a split second.

Twitter, and related apps, seem to do this for the web. It negates the barries created by the huge distances that separate us, because someone can glance at a feed and see what Scoble, or their former work associate, or their co-developer in another country, are up to. It's sort of a virtual version of glancing around the living room to see where everyone's at.

Not saying this is exactly what's going on, or even that it's especially profound -- but I think it's more this than just being able to follow the minutae of people's lives. If it were really just about that -- well, as you said, "no-one is that interesting", and then people would have just stopped using it.

Just some ruminations, that's all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thought on the success of twitter, thus far. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s so much because of the value of knowing exactly what a few of your peers are doing &#8212; I think it&#8217;s the illusion of proximity that&#8217;s created. </p>
<p>If a group of people are hanging out in a living room, there is a sense of community even if they are not all doing the same thing; a few might be playing cards, a few might be on a console video game, someone might be reading or web-surfing. But everyone&#8217;s in the same room &#8212; you can look around and see everyone in a split second.</p>
<p>Twitter, and related apps, seem to do this for the web. It negates the barries created by the huge distances that separate us, because someone can glance at a feed and see what Scoble, or their former work associate, or their co-developer in another country, are up to. It&#8217;s sort of a virtual version of glancing around the living room to see where everyone&#8217;s at.</p>
<p>Not saying this is exactly what&#8217;s going on, or even that it&#8217;s especially profound &#8212; but I think it&#8217;s more this than just being able to follow the minutae of people&#8217;s lives. If it were really just about that &#8212; well, as you said, &#8220;no-one is that interesting&#8221;, and then people would have just stopped using it.</p>
<p>Just some ruminations, that&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Crissman</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/07/23/twitter#comment-1528</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Crissman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philcrissman.com/2007/07/23/twitter/#comment-1528</guid>
		<description>It's adding value for someone, because it's sure getting a lot of use; I don't think it's &lt;em&gt;entirely&lt;/em&gt; narcissistic use, either. I mean, I don't imagine that anyone needs to know what I'm doing 24-7. And if that is truly all it amounts to, I can't imagine myself continuing to use it.

But I thought I'd take a closer look at it before I dismissed it... I guess we'll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s adding value for someone, because it&#8217;s sure getting a lot of use; I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s <em>entirely</em> narcissistic use, either. I mean, I don&#8217;t imagine that anyone needs to know what I&#8217;m doing 24-7. And if that is truly all it amounts to, I can&#8217;t imagine myself continuing to use it.</p>
<p>But I thought I&#8217;d take a closer look at it before I dismissed it&#8230; I guess we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrben</title>
		<link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/07/23/twitter#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>mrben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philcrissman.com/2007/07/23/twitter/#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>Why not? Because no-one is that interesting. It's bad enough with the web full of content-lite blogs without twitter turning the noise-to-signal ratio up to 11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not? Because no-one is that interesting. It&#8217;s bad enough with the web full of content-lite blogs without twitter turning the noise-to-signal ratio up to 11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.698 seconds -->
