Comments on: Using nano and mit-scheme http://philcrissman.com/2006/01/28/using-nano-and-mit-scheme Web Development, startups, entrepreneurship, books, art, and other stuff Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:06:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Phil Crissman http://philcrissman.com/2006/01/28/using-nano-and-mit-scheme#comment-166 Phil Crissman Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:39:00 +0000 http://www.philcrissman.com/2006/01/28/using-nano-and-mit-scheme/#comment-166 I do like that idea, being able to see the code and run it at once; I could accomplish that by opening two xterm windows, but doing both in emacs does seem a little more elegant. I do like that idea, being able to see the code and run it at once; I could accomplish that by opening two xterm windows, but doing both in emacs does seem a little more elegant.

]]> By: Faried Nawaz http://philcrissman.com/2006/01/28/using-nano-and-mit-scheme#comment-165 Faried Nawaz Sun, 29 Jan 2006 08:44:44 +0000 http://www.philcrissman.com/2006/01/28/using-nano-and-mit-scheme/#comment-165 What I usually have is two horizontally-divided buffers open when I'm working on scheme code. The top buffer with my code, and the bottom one with the scheme environment (started with M-x run-scheme RET). I type in some code, jump to the closing paren, and hit C-x C-e to evaluate it in the other buffer. I have the code and the output in one window. What I usually have is two horizontally-divided buffers open when I’m working on scheme code. The top buffer with my code, and the bottom one with the scheme environment (started with M-x run-scheme RET). I type in some code, jump to the closing paren, and hit C-x C-e to evaluate it in the other buffer.

I have the code and the output in one window.

]]>