Your Ad Here

Monthly Archive for October, 2005

Really Slick Screensavers

Not too long ago I remember testing out a Linux LiveCD of some distro or another–I don’t really remember which one–and when I fired up xscreensaver (ooh, pretty lines and colors), I saw a screensaver called flux, which I had never seen before. Strange, I thought. Perhaps this is a brand new/beta version of xscreensaver.


Flux is part of an xscreensaver expansion known as Really Slick Screensavers –there are about a dozen of them and they are, in fact, really slick.

However, as near as I could tell, the version of xscreensaver on my desktop was completely up-to-date. I assumed that “flux” must be a third-party addition. With this in mind, this morning I decided to google for the flux screensaver.

What I found was that flux is part of an xscreensaver expansion known as Really Slick Screensavers–there are about a dozen of them and they are, in fact, really slick.

You can look at some screenshots, if you like.

If you’re using gentoo, you can install these with


# USE="xscreensaver openal 3dnow" emerge rss-glx -av

If you’re using debian (of some sort), you should be able to do this (I haven’t tested the debian install, not having a debian system running right now):


# apt-get install rss-glx

If you aren’t using debian or gentoo… why not? Just kidding; but you may need to look on the sourceforge rss-glx page for more information; it does sound like there are rpm files out there, or you could always compile the source.


Continue reading ‘Really Slick Screensavers’

Ubuntu’s Wireless utility easier than Windows

Now this is what we like to see: Ubuntu’s Wireless Utility Easier than Windows.

The fact that it is simply a gtk app (or so one would be led to believe from the name (hello) and screenshots) makes me hopeful that we’ll see this soon on other distributions. Sounds like a cool tool for the Linux desktop of the next 5-10 years; world domination, and all that.

Continue reading ‘Ubuntu’s Wireless utility easier than Windows’

Paul Graham at OSCON

IT Conversations has an audio post of Paul Graham from the O’Reilly Open Source Convention 2005. Now that I listen to it, I think that this is an essay which has been on Paul’s site for awhile; one of the quotes which randomly appears atop this site is from this speech.

However, in case you’d rather listen to a speech than read an essay, the link is about for your listening pleasure.


Continue reading ‘Paul Graham at OSCON’

Stryper

As an aside, Stryper has a new album. Okay, it’s been out since August; but I’m only just hearing it now.

I was a Stryper fan back when it was cool to be a Stryper fan; like, around 1986. So for nostalgia, if nothing else, getting ahold of the new album was a no-brainer.

You know what? It’s better than I expected it to be. The style is not exactly what I would call my favorite style; but it’s amazing what one is willing to forgive when the band in question was a past favorite.

Now if we could just get Believer to make a new album…


Continue reading ‘Stryper’

Why do people switch to Linux?

Slashdot is discussing the results of a Lxer survey on why people switch to Linux. OReillynet has a good summary.

Long time readers, or even casual readers, will probably know that I’m an advocate of desktop Linux; I’m always interested in ways that desktop Linux is being improved, and in any stories of companies/cities/individuals who have successfully made it their primary platform. I think it is a viable platform for consumer use, if not today then definitely within the coming 5-10 years.

However, I would say that the answers to this survey are telling as to why Linux is still primarily the platform of tech-savvy individuals, and not the average consumer. One respondent said that Linux gave him the chance to “play with the kernel,” which was “something I’d been wanting to do for a long time…” Let’s be honest; my brother-in-law is not interested in playing with his kernel. Nor are my parents, my sister, or most of the people I help everyday solve computer problems. You might say it isn’t fair to pick this one example, but a lot of the responses fall into this category; the user wanted to “fiddle” and Linux allowed for this; or because they wanted a “challenge.”

These are not reasons, in general, which will make your Mom decide to switch to Linux.

The more pragmatic reasons to switch to Linux–relative security from viruses, trojans, and malware, more stability, less expensive–are almost all echoed by the #2 desktop platform, Macintosh (except the “less expensive” part, of course).

So, supposing that we are interested in the advance of Linux on the desktop in the next 5-10 years; what sort of reasons do we want to be hearing from users?

I think we want to hear things like, I switched to Linux because it was easier to use; I switched because all the software I needed had an alternative there that was cheap or free; or, even better (the tipping point) I switched because so many of my friends/associates were using it, it was a lot easier to be working on the same platform.

Yes, the future success of Linux will depend to an extent on the engineering of the various software components which make up the whole operating environment. If the software is buggy, that would be a big turn-off, so naturally well-integrated software will be a major key.

If we want people to love Linux, we will basically need to tell them why they should love Linux; which is just another name for marketing. The success of Linux will rest on who markets it, and how they market it.


Continue reading ‘Why do people switch to Linux?’

MOO.fx, and the state of JavaScript

Moo.fx bills itself as “the next small thing.” It’s a JavaScript library, which seems to offer at least some of the slick effects of js libraries like Prototype and the script.aculo.us effects; but in a teeny, teeny package. 3 Kb, actually.

There was once a time when I felt that JavaScript was a little quaint; something that was used on web pages in 1998, and was no longer needed or interesting. (Yes, I have noted before my outstanding ability to display zero technological foresight.) I have to say that in the last year, my opinion has completely flipped. Sure, you could say that it’s a bit of a fad; AJAX being the buzzword of the moment, new, “cool,” JavaScript libraries popping up all over the internet–but the way I see it, if you couldn’t do cool things with it, it wouldn’t be a fad.

JavaScript is nice because it’s ubiquitous, also. Sure, a few folks may have it turned off, but those folks are generally tech-savvy, and can easily turn it back on if they need to. I like Flash, and I’m learning more about using it all the time–but there’s something really admirable about a site that manages to be as beautiful and dynamic as a Flash site… while using no Flash at all.

Also, if you aren’t a digg reader, you might have missed Phil Renaud’s list of 35 websites, all of which are stellar examples of design (some using Flash, and many not). Very nice.


Continue reading ‘MOO.fx, and the state of JavaScript’

What Would Jesus Blog?

I’ve remarked before that I have a hard time, generally, writing content of a spiritual nature for this blog. It’s not because I don’t like writing about that sort of thing; it’s just that I had become entrenched in a certain subset of topics that I liked to write about, and they tended, mostly, to be secular in nature. Technology, politics, business… and occasionally spiritual things.

I’m not sure exactly why that is, but for whatever reason, it’s been the case. So I decided to start another blog; I actually decided to start it several months ago, but I’ve only been blogging on it for a few days now. It can be found at whatwouldjesusblog.com. The name could be a little cheesy; that’s okay, I don’t particularly care. It came, in part, from a post Brian Bailey wrote a long time back where he speculated on what a book about Christian blogging would be called. Well, as it turns out, they are writing one, but they aren’t using that title; so I figured I would. ;-)

If you are reading this blog because it’s often about Linux, technology, programming, or web development, then this other blog might not be for you. On the other hand, if you are a Christian, you might like it. Heck, you might like it better than this one.

On a more technical note; I’m using WordPress for the new blog. Having used it for about a week now… I [heart] WordPress. WordPress is fantastic blogging software. Probably in the next few months, I’m going to switch philcrissman.com over to WordPress as well. I still like Mambo/Joomla, but a full-blown CMS is pretty much overkill for a simple blog like I’m doing here; might as use the right tool.


Continue reading ‘What Would Jesus Blog?’

The Task of Management

I was sitting in Borders (large US bookstore chain) the other night, and started flipping through The Essential Drucker, a compilation of some of Peter Drucker’s essays on management.

Here’s a cool quote on management from the first chapter:

Management is about human beings. Its task is to make people capable of joint performance, to make their strengths effective and their weaknesses irrelevant. (p. 10)

Management is often maligned more than it is praised; the typical portrayal of the office features a manager who is bumbling, incompetent, or clueless–or some combination of all three. Dilbert, Office Space, sit-com “The Office” (both UK and US versions), all feature managers of this sort; there are probably dozens of other examples in film, television, or other media.

It also seems to be universally the case that the average person, when confronted with portrayals such as Dilbert, et al, will say, “Oh yes, that’s just like my office…” in some form.

There are a couple major conclusions one could draw from this; for one, one could assume that most managers are not good managers. The other conclusion could be that most employees are not able to accurately guage the skill of their manager(s).

Of course, there must exist many skilled managers, whose subordinates also recognize them as skilled and competent managers. But the preponderance of popular culture reference to the “terrible manager” archtype would lead us to believe, again, that either there are hundreds of thousands of incompetent managers at large… or else the people who are labelling them as “incompetent” are, in fact, incorrect.

The three things that Drucker mentions: enabling joint performance, accentuating people’s strengths, and minimizing their weaknesses… are not necessarily the activities which people may be judging their managers upon. So, people may be coming to the conclusions that their managers are incompetent, when in fact those managers may be doing exactly what they should be doing.

That being said, there are undoubtedly managers who may not be skilled in managing people; that’s a fact of life as well. Also, we could suggest that the best manager would be one who was able to not only implement those things Drucker described, but also to communicate to his people what he is doing, and why; in other words, ideally, communication would be effective enough that people do not form a wrong impression about the competence of a particular manager.

As a caveat, I don’t currently have the responsibility of managing people, and I’ve certainly had my share of managers who were (in my opinion at the time) good, bad, or various shades in between. I’m not attempting a blanket defense of all managers everywhere; I just thought that Drucker’s quote was extremely interesting, and that there must be some way to account for the fact that, in popular culture, the archtype is for the manager to be incompetent.

So, does anyone out there have stories about managers who are competent, who do the things that Drucker defined “management” as being?


Continue reading ‘The Task of Management’

The Meme

For awhile I’ve been seeing the word “meme” used in a way which, while perhaps not strictly inaccurate, falls far short of the full impact of the concept which the word is intended to evoke.

You may know what I mean; in blogging, such things as “name your five favorite albums, and call on x other people to do the same…” will be called a meme. This is fun, nothing wrong with that at all; but to my mind, it only barely qualifies for the term meme. In the sense that yes, it is technically viral, and will spread around.

A meme is traditionally not simply a little list like that; it’s an idea. Not just any idea, but an idea that takes on a life of it’s own; it’s an idea that is viral, or self-replicating. Students of memetics (yes, there is such a thing) would refer to Christianity as a meme. I don’t think that this necessarily takes away from the reality of the Gospel (as I see it, at least) — calling the Gospel a meme is simply making the observation that it was an idea which spread in a way in which other ideas did not, to the point that two thousand years later, it is still spreading; last I heard Pentecostalism (which is only one part of what we would call “Christendom”) was one of the fastest growing religious groups in the world.

Many fads and styles, such as Gladwell writes about in his Tipping Point, are basically memes.

Web 2.0 is a meme; more than a style, a technology, or a feature set, “web 2.0″ is an idea. It is the idea that there is something new happening on the platform we call the world wide web, which was not happening before. You could go a lot further than that, but that seems to be where agreement as to what “web 2.0″ is or is not starts to break down. The basic kernel of the idea is maintained across the board, though: whatever web 2.0 is, evidently it is new and exciting.

The concept of a meme is very powerful. It is analogous to that holy grail of marketing: word of mouth. Not just any word of mouth, but fanatical customer evangelism. It’s a lot like what Seth Godin called the IdeaVirus.

I can see this concept being, more and more, a central one in the converging worlds of advertising, marketing, product evangelism, and business, especially online. When you have people writing blogs about corporations–like Google, Starbucks, or Microsoft–or about products (Linux, Firefox, etc.), not because they are being paid, but simply because they want to…

I’m not in the advertising field, but from what I hear, some of this is already changing the way marketing is done. Companies are starting blogs on purpose, understanding (or, at least, pretending to understand) that this will connect with their audience better than Michael Jordan in a commercial during the superbowl. (Though that’s not a bad idea, either; keep that in mind.)

You might also find the wikipedia entry on this topic interesting. The concept of the meme is fascinating, and worth thinking about (you could say that the concept of the meme is, itself, a meme); it’s certainly much more than a simple internet “chain letter.”


Continue reading ‘The Meme’

Suse 10.0 Review

Mad Penguin has a review of Suse 10.0. I won’t pretend that I have the time to test this distribution out myself right now, but I like they direction that Novell seems to be going; staying flexible (choice of KDE or Gnome, both the newest versions, I believe), and integrating Mono applications (Beagle, for example).

If you’re a Linux newbie, still looking for the right distribution to settle down and explore, maybe this is a good choice; easy enough to get started, powerful enough to learn a lot. I’ve a soft spot for Ubuntu as a beginners distro, too, though; Your Mileage May Vary.


Continue reading ‘Suse 10.0 Review’


Your Ad Here