Your Ad Here

Monthly Archive for May, 2005

Hard America Soft America

Today I began to read Hard America, Soft America by Michael Barone. Borders puts this in the poli-sci section, though Barone says right away that the book is about how Americans live, not about how they vote. There are probably some left-right generalizations that could be made regarding Barone’s division of the Soft and Hard Americas, but that is not meant to be his main point.

So far, this is a great book. In brief, Barone classifies “Soft” America as the America that gives things to you; the America that makes life easier. Into this category would fall public schools, and even most private schools, colleges, and unversities, welfare-type programs, etc.–you get the idea. “Hard” America is the “real world,” competition, business, the bottom-line, industry–the “make it or break it” world which, in general, Americans are supposed to be ready to join after High School.


Barone begins by making the point that most high school graduates are not ready to enter Hard America:

For many years I have thought it one of the peculiar features of our country that we seem to produce incompetent eighteen-year-olds but remarkably competent thirty-year-olds.

Barone qualifies this, of course, since there are obviously exceptions to this rule. The tone of the book is further set here, after Barone has spent a little more time elaborating on what Hard and Soft America is:

There will naturally be differences about how much of American life should be Hard and how much Soft–something reasonable Americans will argue about forever. But as we consider those arguments I think we have to keep this in mind: Soft America lives off the productivity, creativity, and competence of Hard America, and we have the luxury of keeping parts of our society Soft only if we keep enough of it Hard.

Continue reading ‘Hard America Soft America’

LyingLiar (for Senator)

I cringe at the thought of putting anything related to Al Franken under the heading “politics.” Chomsky should stick to linguistics, and Franken should stick to comedy. But since on the one hand it seems likely that he may actually run for office, and on the other it is plain that he’s leveraged his comedic notoriety to position himself as a pundit, I suppose this post falls under the “politics” category.

There’s a well argued satire/critique of Al Franken on the web at LyingLiar.com. Among other things, this rebuttal to his chapter about Ann Coulter is worth a read.

Continue reading ‘LyingLiar (for Senator)’

Meet the Cotillion

I just spent a pleasant lunch hour following the links through the members of the Cotillion, which is a group of conservative female bloggers. They have lots of great and interesting things to say, and I hope the formation of the Cotillion, and the prodigious linking to one to another, gives them all the exposure they deserve, and more.

I’ve found at least one (if not more) which will be immediately added to my blogroll and regular reading schedule: RightWingSparkle. Her post, >Understanding Christian Conservatives 101, is an exemplary profile of the Conservative Christian, who (as she says) does not “hate fags” or plot to blow up abortion clinics.

That is just one that stood out; these women rock. Check them out.

I have only one question: why is Michelle Malkin not in there? After reading Michelle, if anyone ever told me I write like a girl, I’d take it as a compliment.

Continue reading ‘Meet the Cotillion’

The Extreme Left, and Israel

I’ve been reading Benjamin Kerstein’s blog, diary of an anti-Chomskyite, for awhile now. Normally I’m not too keen on defining oneself purely on the basis of who or what one is against, but in Noam Chomsky’s case I’m willing to make an exception.

For those who may be blissfully unaware of Chomsky’s existence, he is one of the pre-eminent intellectuals of the extreme left. His more legitimate claim to fame is in the field of Linguistics, in which he is somewhat of a guru as well, but he has been successful in leveraging this scholastic notoriety to gain an audience for his extreme political views. Most of his quasi-supporters seem to conveniently forget that he is not a Democrat, but an anarchist, who said in his foreword to Daniel Guerin’s Anarchism, “Any consistent anarchist must oppose private ownership of the means of production, and … wage slavery…” (the quote is from memory, I may have paraphrased marginally).

Getting to my main point, Benjamin’s latest is a long, interesting article about the extreme left’s view of Israel, in this case in an analysis of the writings of someone who is actually criticizing Chomsky for not being anti-Israel enough. Really interesting reading.

Continue reading ‘The Extreme Left, and Israel’

How Linux can beat Microsoft

The title of this post is actually not mine, but is an article found in MIT’s Technology Review this month.


While fitting the Standard Template for Linux articles, the article manages to emerge with a little more to offer than most normal (yawn) “Linux is winning/not winning” articles. For one, it has graphs. This may seem like a small thing, but I’ve found that it’s fairly rare for an article about the adoption of Linux to use many statistics at all to back up the premise. Usually, for the pro-Linux article, it is enough that Linux is free; and for the anti-Linux article, it is enough that it is too hard for my mom to use. Like it or not, these are the general criteria I’ve seen used to make or break a thesis about the future of Linux. Free versus Mom.

Reading the above, it would seem that “free” will win in the workplace, and “mom” will win at home. I’d say that this is the general conclusion that a lot of people have come to; but the thing is, as something gains wider acceptance in the workplace, it will migrate to the home. If people use Linux as a desktop at work, eventually they will start saying, You know, I could use one of these at home. This works pretty good.

Getting back to the MIT TR article, it’s a long-ish, insightful article, with a fair bit of actual data, and some reasonable prognostication. The author is not just another journalist who thinks that he should tackle the “linux angle” this month, but is Charles Ferguson, who founded Vermeer Technologies, which was sold to Microsoft in 1996. So, it isn’t as though he is a barely Linux-aware journalist, or a rabid Linux zealot, but someone who could actually have something interesting to say about the whole affair.

That’s nice, for a change.

Continue reading ‘How Linux can beat Microsoft’

Clichés in a nutshell


We are told to avoid cliché. Most of us forget that this is good advice; I’m not going to review recent posts now, but I’m sure I’d find a fair bit of cliché in my own writing. Avoiding cliché will help you think about what you are actually trying to say, and force you to come up with a plain way to say it, and ultimately make you a better writer.

You may say, I don’t care about being a better writer, I’m just communicating! People know what I mean. Yes, well, that is the reason to use a cliché; it is a sort of short-hand for conceptual expression. We use them precisely because we expect people to know what they mean. The problem is that they are so familiar it may weaken what you’re trying to express, or worse, make your writing seem a little boring.

In a few days you may see some writing about how I installed Arch Linux on my laptop, which I was writing just now. Near the start I began to say that I was going to overview the installation process, and I almost wrote something like “here it is in a nutshell.” Then I thought, you know, I wouldn’t mind going the rest of my life without reading about something else being in a nutshell. I figured that at this point, if I see the words “in a nutshell” in a text, there better be an O’Reilly imprint on the spine. Then I began to write something like, “here’s a whirlwind tour…” Whirlwind tour. Hmm. That sounds a trifle overused as well. I finally settled (pending revision) on calling it an “executive summary.” While this is also a common expression, it is not a cliche in the same sense as the last two; an executive summary is a concrete product, with a clearly defined meaning. It has a reason for being, and my overview matched the same criteria. If I were a really great writer, I might have avoided using any expression at all, and just written, “here’s an overview.”

Unfortunately, I’m just not that good. But maybe someday.

Continue reading ‘Clichés in a nutshell’

John Schwarzenegger

Just watched, on TV, the horribly bad 90s action flick “Eraser” starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. As I did, it occured to me that Arnold has played a lot of people named “John.”

Well, it turns out not that many after all. He was John Kruger in “Eraser”, John Kimble in “Kindergarten Cop”, and John Matrix in “Commando.” In “Terminator”, on the other hand, he was trying to kill John Connor.

So not so many Johns after all. So much for my list of wacky coincidences.

Continue reading ‘John Schwarzenegger’

Decisions, decisions

Regarding my laptop, which I had said I was loading the RHEL4… well, it turns out that disc 3 was unreadable, so I decided not to bother.

So I went and loaded Arch Linux on the box. I’m currently messing around with it a little, trying to decide if I’m going to keep it on there or try something different.

At the moment I’m messing with xorg.

(short pause)

Hmm. Just brought xorg up (for the non-Linux initiate, this means a windowing environment; in this case, plain old X with twm, an old, ugly, window manager). Maybe I’ll stick with Arch Linux and see how it goes.

I guess we can expect a more thorough review of Arch Linux on a Dell Inspiron sometime soon!

Continue reading ‘Decisions, decisions’

Getting Blogs Done

Thanks to Terry for pointing this out:

Keith at To-Done.com has a list of ways to be more productive as a blogger.

I’m all about lists, especially useful ones. A lot of these suggestions seem pretty useful.

Continue reading ‘Getting Blogs Done’

Garage, Money, Laptop

The title of this post has been my to-do list for the day. I went and bought some shelves at Home Depot, put them up in the garage, and proceeded to Make The Garage Look Nicer™.

Next on the list is money; the bank account needs balancing.

Last on the list is my laptop. I’m about to wipe everything off of it and start over, I think. I’m still debating whether to stick with what I know best and run Gentoo on it, or whether to try one of the many other fine Linux distributions on it. I may just test out Ubuntu again, but I’m not sure I’ll be content with that; Arch Linux, perhaps?

So many choices. More later.

UPDATE

I’ve noticed that I have a copy of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 laying around, which I have never installed anywhere. I figure I’ll load it on the laptop and try it out for awhile because:

  • I don’t have time to install Gentoo this weekend.
  • Running RHEL4 on my laptop will give me an excuse to test it for more than a few minutes, and see how well it does.
  • It will give me something to blog about.
  • It’s handy.

The install, so far, is as slick as Red Hat’s installs usually are, but nothing greatly out of the ordinary. I’m hoping to be pleasantly surprised… to find things that “just work,” and to learn a little more about RPMs.

Continue reading ‘Garage, Money, Laptop’


Your Ad Here